While it might be really clear to MM developers that gfp reclaim modifiers
are applicable only to sleepable allocations (those with
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) it seems that actual users of the API are not always
sure.  Make it explicit that they are not applicable for GFP_NOWAIT or
GFP_ATOMIC allocations which are the most commonly used non-sleepable
allocation masks.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200403083543.11552-3-mhocko@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>