Adélie Package Tree issueshttps://git.adelielinux.org/adelie/packages/-/issues2023-11-15T23:53:00Zhttps://git.adelielinux.org/adelie/packages/-/issues/7[meta] POSIX®: UP: talk(1) is required2023-11-15T23:53:00ZEmily[meta] POSIX®: UP: talk(1) is required| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 7 |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-04-17 10:58:12 -0500 |
| Modified | 2020-04-19 07:09:34 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED |
| Version | 1.0-ALP...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 7 |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-04-17 10:58:12 -0500 |
| Modified | 2020-04-19 07:09:34 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED |
| Version | 1.0-ALPHA1 |
| Hardware | Adélie Linux / All |
| Importance | Normal / normal |
| Blocks | https://bts.adelielinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 |
## Description
The User Portability Utilities option of POSIX® 1003.1-2013 requires an implementation of talk(1). One is available in portage as net-misc/netkit-talk, but there are a number of issues with it:
* HOMEPAGE is dead (ftp.uk.linux.org doesn't exist any more).
* The NetKit package is listed as "orphaned" at the Linux Foundation. ( http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netkit )
* talk is pretty insecure, from what I remember of it. In fairness, I haven't used it since 2010.
* I think it may require inetd/xinetd to function properly.
We can do a few different things:
* Package netkit-talk, but don't install it in base. We then note that conformance with the UP option requires installation of the package.
* Install netkit-talk in base.
* Do not package netkit-talk, and do not conform to the UP option.---https://git.adelielinux.org/adelie/packages/-/issues/3[meta] POSIX® conformance tracker2023-11-15T23:53:04ZEmily[meta] POSIX® conformance tracker| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 3 |
| Alias(es) | POSIX |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-04-16 14:20:26 -0500 |
| Modified | 2017-10-08 18:25:23 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED ...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 3 |
| Alias(es) | POSIX |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-04-16 14:20:26 -0500 |
| Modified | 2017-10-08 18:25:23 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED |
| Version | 1.0-ALPHA1 |
| Hardware | Adélie Linux / All |
| Importance | Normal / normal |
| Depends on | https://bts.adelielinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5<br>https://bts.adelielinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7<br>https://bts.adelielinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4<br>https://bts.adelielinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8<br>https://bts.adelielinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35 |
## Description
This bug is a tracking bug for determining issues we have relating to POSIX® conformance.
Currently, we are targeting the 2013 edition.---https://git.adelielinux.org/adelie/packages/-/issues/21system/musl: musl libc has not been vetted to conform with LSB 5.0 Part II2022-02-02T17:10:22ZEmilysystem/musl: musl libc has not been vetted to conform with LSB 5.0 Part II| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 21 |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-10-23 21:12:36 -0500 |
| Modified | 2016-10-23 21:12:36 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED |
| Version | 1.0-AL...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 21 |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-10-23 21:12:36 -0500 |
| Modified | 2016-10-23 21:12:36 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED |
| Version | 1.0-ALPHA1 |
| Hardware | Adélie Linux / All |
| Importance | Normal / major |
## Description
This is a future task that is highly complicated and involved, but it would be very good to ensure that the musl libc conforms fully to LSB 5.0 Part II, which specifies the relevant sections of ELF and the expected behaviours of the dynamic linker on a conforming Linux system.---https://git.adelielinux.org/adelie/packages/-/issues/5system/musl: musl libc does not provide an implementation of gencat(1) and ca...2022-05-02T04:23:48ZEmilysystem/musl: musl libc does not provide an implementation of gencat(1) and catopen/catgets/catclose(3)| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 5 |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-04-16 14:37:36 -0500 |
| Modified | 2020-04-19 06:37:28 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED |
| Version | 1.0-ALP...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla ID | 5 |
| Reporter | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Assignee | A. Wilcox (awilfox) |
| Reported | 2016-04-16 14:37:36 -0500 |
| Modified | 2020-04-19 06:37:28 -0500 |
| Status | CONFIRMED |
| Version | 1.0-ALPHA1 |
| Hardware | Adélie Linux / All |
| Importance | Normal / major |
| Blocks | https://bts.adelielinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 |
## Description
The musl libc does not currently provide an implementation of POSIX® message catalogues. This is used by at least BIND for internationalisation and therefore we will be stuck with English only strings for all BIND tools (including dig, host, nslookup).
Additionally, POSIX® documents that this interface is required for a conforming implementation.---